Sunday, March 20, 2011

Wyclef Jean shot in Haiti!

(AP) Rapper Wyclef Jean, who campaigned last year to become president of Haiti, was shot in the Caribbean country on Saturday, reports the Associated Press.

Jean was shot in the hand late Saturday evening in Port-au-Prince, his publicist said Sunday. The rapper was treated in the hospital and released.

“He is doing well,” spokeswoman Cindy Tanenbaum told CNN, adding that the wound was superficial.

Tanenbaum didn’t provide details on why Jean was shot.

The Haitian hip-hop singer was visiting the nation to raise support for presidential candidate Michel Martelly.

According to Jean’s Twitter account, he is holding up fine.

We have spoken to Wyclef, he is ok,” Jean’s management wrote on his Twitter page. “Thank you for your thoughts and prayers.”

Jean, a solo artist, was born in Haiti and attempted to become leader of the country last year in the wake of the country’s devastating earthquake. In August, Jean filed papers to run in the nation’s presidential election, but was criticized by many for this decision.

Actor and political activist Sean Penn slammed Jean for seeking office.

“This is somebody who’s going to receive an enormous amount of support from the United States, and I have to say I’m very suspicious of it,” Penn said in August.

Arcade Fire’s Win Butler argued that Jean shouldn’t be eligible because the rapper hadn’t been living in
Haiti. Jean’s bid was ultimately rejected because he failed to meet the residency requirement which stipulated candidates must have lived in Haiti for five years prior to the Nov. 28 election.


*This is very interesting as Wyclef is rebounding from his failed bid for President of Haiti. It seems Wyclef is doing all he can to connect himself to Haiti. It may be possible he wants to run again; so having more of presence (putting his face in the place) strategy may be his way of saying that's he's not giving up on becoming President of Haiti in the future. In any event, him being shot isn't a good thing at all! Whoever shot him may not want him in Haiti at all.

Haiti has suffered enough due to the enormous earthquake that took place there. As the rebuilding process continues, hopefully people like Wyclef can keep the attention on Haiti and not just on themselves.*


Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Saturday, March 19, 2011

Is Reality TV Hurting Our Kids?

(Parents.com) We all watched as that duct-tape enforced balloon drifted higher and higher, and now we all shake our heads with disapproval as more facts come out about the Heene parents, who had appeared with their kids on “Wife Swap” and were hoping to score another reality-show breakthrough. As 6-year-old Falcon Heene vomited during media interviews and then stated on CNN’s “Larry King Live” what appears to be the true crux of the ballooning story—“You guys said we did this for the show"—it became clear that his reality-show driven parents might actually be living in an alternate reality.

But there are ways you can keep your own kids from being impacted by reality television. As a psychotherapist and CEO of the Personal Growth Institute, a non-profit psychotherapy agency dedicated to helping individuals, couples, children, teens and families in Los Angeles, Dr. Foojan Zeine has some advice for how parents can keep their own children from being seduced by what they see on screen.

She says that parents need to teach kids the difference between “reality” and “entertainment,” because for today's kids the line has become so thin. Whether it’s “Jon & Kate Plus 8”/ “Kate Plus Eight” or “18 Kids and Counting,” “Nanny 911” or “SuperNanny,” “The Baby Borrowers” or “Toddlers & Tiaras,” each episode passes off these larger-than-life shows as true-to-life.

The problem that Dr. Zeine sees most frequently in her patients is a disconnect between their lives and the lives they see on television. That’s because reality shows have to have some kind of plot or excitement if they want to stay on the air, so the kids who star in them have to act up and practically become a caricature of themselves to make for interesting TV.

The kids who are at home viewing naturally compare the shows to their own lives, and often conclude that their day-to-day existence is pretty darn boring. They don’t see kids on TV having any downtime, so when they, themselves have free time they’re not even sure of what to do with it.

“It’s a lot of stress for the kids on TV, but also it’s a lot of stress for the people who are watching. Why? Because they also think, ‘My life is boring, and I’ve got to constantly come up with something else,’” says Dr. Zeine.

She says that one way to solve that problem is for parents to sit down and watch the reality show with their child. That way, they can discuss the ways that kids behave and what’s acceptable or not acceptable about what they’re seeing, along with what’s real and what’s likely staged for the purpose of plot. This kind of open communication not only helps kids better understand the line between real and entertainment, it can also help strengthen your own family relationship.


“You open a dialogue with your children and then do your own parenting piece at that moment. So you can take the reality show and make it into an educational piece for yourself."

It’s an easy enough solution for those of us on this side of the plasma screen, but what about the kids who are actually in the shows? Hopefully their parents have a decent therapist lined up. Because the children who have roles on the TV shows are in need of a reality check, says Dr. Zeine. Whereas child actors have always been likely candidates for the next “E! True Hollywood Story,” she says that because of excess stress and unrealistic expectations, child reality show stars could actually be in for an even more difficult future. 

“I think it’s worse for the reality show group because they don’t have to have any skills,” she says. “They get it that they don’t have to do anything, they just need to be on TV and be sensational. They have to exaggerate. They have to do something silly or weird just to get attention. So I think it’s almost like the difference of gambling and learning a skill to get better at.”

In the case of the Heene family, that gambling didn’t exactly lead to a jackpot. For the sake of Falcon and his brothers, let’s hope that they’ve been grounded by the experience, in more ways than one.


*Reality TV is an eye sore anyway you look at it. It's not real and does nothing to educate the population. In order to get high ratings, there must be huge dramatics, fighting, girls showing their ass and tits and a whirl-wind of antics. Someone please tell me if that's educational?

More than anything these days, parents are trying to escape their own reality of worry and tragedy. So, what you have these days are parents engaged in reality TV and many on reality TV.

They keep forgetting that kids watch more TV than they should and more are watching reality TV shows. The parents who don't care about reality TV, but let their kids engage in it, have to get on their parenting duties and turn the channel or turn it off completely and send their little asses outside or have them do something educational.

Keeping it real, we really can't say that reality TV is hurting our kids. It's the parents that let them watch it over and over on their watch. Heck; most parents watch it with their kids and they seem to think it's ok. At the end of the day, reality TV is not reality TV. Parents are the reality and that should be practiced daily so that kids don't get the wrong idea.


Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Friday, March 18, 2011

Higher milk prices don't help dairy farmers much!

While milk prices continue to rise and exports to Asian markets have expanded, many dairy farmers are still struggling with the aftermath of several disastrous years and hoping the federal government will do something to help stabilize the industry.

After milk prices plunged and farms began going under, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said a year and a half ago that the industry needed restructuring and his department would look at its programs to see what changes could be made to help create more stability.

A committee the U.S. Department of Agriculture formed in 2009 in response to the crisis issued its recommendations this month, but no legislation has been written yet. Agriculture officials say it's forthcoming.

That's not a lot of comfort for farmers like Jamie Bledsoe of Riverdale, who saw his income drop by $2 million in 2009 and had to sell off about 300 cows to pay his bills. Many dairy farmers used up savings and sold property they had accumulated over 15 or 20 years, he said.

Now, they're being squeezed by high corn prices and an inability to get loans to buy feed for their cows. The situation is particularly bad in California, where most dairy farmers don't grow their own hay and corn.

Nearly 250 dairies in California have gone under in the past three years, and more are expected to close this year, said Michael Marsh, chief executive of Western United Dairymen. California is the nation's No. 1 milk producer, followed by Wisconsin and Idaho.

The crisis started when milk prices that had been driven up by demand in developing nations plummeted from a high of $18 per hundred pounds in 2008 to about $12 amid the recession in 2009. Farmers began slaughtering their cows to try to cut production. At one point, an average of 50,000 cows a week were being killed in an effort to reduce the milk glut.

This year, milk is expected to average about $17 per hundred pounds. But farmers aren't doing much better than before because federal subsidies for ethanol have created a big demand for corn among biofuel producers and prices have skyrocketed, said Ray Souza, a California farmer who serves on the USDA's
Dairy Industry Advisory Committee. About a third of the U.S. corn crop now feeds car engines, not cows, and Souza said feed accounts for about half of dairy farmers' expenses.

Tom Barcellos, who runs an 800-cow dairy in Tipton, said farmers used to be able to borrow against their herds to get money to buy feed, but the value of cows has slipped, making it hard to get credit. Many dairy farmers now have barely a truckload of feed left, he said.

"It's hand to mouth," he said. "They have no feed, they have used up equity, and they have to buy a load of feed at a time to try to hang on."

Dairy farmers are usually optimistic about bouncing back, he said. "But we never expected it would take this long to recover."

The dairy industry has been working on a plan to reform the nation's dairy policy, and many of its proposals were mirrored in the federal panel's recommendations.
Most significantly, the Dairy Industry Advisory Committee recommended replacing or improving the federal government's two traditional safety nets: the price support and Milk Income Loss Contract programs.

The price support program buys surplus dairy products to try to prevent a glut, but industry experts say its prices are too low to help farmers. The MILC program pays farmers directly but it doesn't cover all their losses, and it pays only on up to 3 million pounds of milk per year. That means it's of little help to large dairies such as those in California.

Instead, the committee has recommended helping farmers with feed costs by doing away with ethanol subsidies and creating an insurance program that would pay farmers when the difference between milk and feed prices becomes too small.

It also recommended creation of a growth-management program that would provide financial penalties for farmers who don't reduce production when demand drops; increasing incentive payments for good environmental practices; adopting measures to ensure dairies have access to a stable, legal immigrant labor force; and enhancing the nutritional value of the nation's milk to boost demand.

Differences in how policies affect the large dairies in the West and smaller ones in Wisconsin and New England have made it hard for farmers to agree on reforms.
 
But Bill Bruins, a dairyman and president of the Wisconsin Farm Bureau Federation, said he thinks farmers are focused now on "proposing a policy that benefits everyone and allows us to become players on the world market, where most growth is."

The U.S. shipped $3.7 billion of dairy products overseas last year, 63 percent more than the previous year and almost as much as the $3.8 billion worth in 2008, according to the U.S. Dairy Export Council. Moving away from the traditional price support program and selling surplus to the government, which stifles innovation, would benefit everyone, Bruins said.


*What a hot "dairy" mess! With the price of milk going up and up these days, farmers still are struggling. It's sad because farming is very important. We need farms to produce milk, food, and those basic necessities that we as people use daily. What we don't need to use our farms for, are production of ethenol.  It's not a good look for farming because it doesn't say farming. There should be a program in place to help our farmers keep their heads above water, and not have to close up shop. There should be protection for them! After all they supply this nation with milk and food.

As for the price of milk, well, that's a "cat and mouse" game in itself. Everytime there's a crisis in another country America's food prices go up. I find that to be suspect totally. We have numerous people running the show and it has nothing to do with the price of oil; like they want us to continue to believe! It has to do crummy investors, big corporations, and the US government.  It's all close to home and it has been going on for years. At the end of the day, blaming Egypt or the crisis in Libya isn't going to cut it! We all know what's really happening!


Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Thursday, March 17, 2011

CDC: Kidney transplant spread HIV from live donor!

(AP) A New York City patient was infected with the AIDS virus through a kidney transplant from a live donor, in what health officials are calling the first confirmed U.S. case since the 1980s.

The case is considered extremely rare, but some health officials noted that there is no strict policy for when live donors should be tested for the AIDS virus before a transplant.

In reporting the New York case on Thursday, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that organ donors have sophisticated tests for HIV within a week of surgery.

In this case, the male donor was tested for HIV about 10 weeks before he donated a kidney and the results were negative. Health officials believe he was infected between that test and the 2009 surgery; he reported having unprotected sex with another man during that time.

Neither the donor nor the recipient knew they had HIV until about a year after the transplant, according to the CDC report. No other details about the donor or recipient or their relationship were released.

Health officials say both are receiving HIV treatment.

"We don't know how frequently this is happening and we need better surveillance," said Dr. Matthew Kuehnert, a CDC official who co-authored the report.

At least one similar U.S. case has been reported in the media. An Orlando woman last year filed a lawsuit, saying she was infected with HIV through a 2007 kidney transplant in Florida. However, CDC officials say they have not been asked to investigate and could not confirm the report.

Italian doctors reported a case in 1989.

Living donors are routinely screened — as are organs from deceased donors — for HIV, hepatitis and other infectious diseases. Testing for HIV began in 1985.

Kidneys from live donors are becoming increasingly common. In 1988, about 32 percent of kidney transplants came from live donors. By last year, it was more than 46 percent, according to federal data.

The report is being published in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.


*WOW! This will scare the mess out of people that really need a kidney! This is unbelievable! How is it that a  person goes in and gets a kidney from a live donor, and yet there is no policy for when the live donor should be tested for the AIDS virus before the transplant? Shouldn't they have a strict policy for testing live donors for the AIDS virus?  You would think there would be a test of this sort, due to everyday society.  The way we see it, society has messed up ways of going about things such as this, and with that, certain people get the short-end of the stick due to the mess-ups of society. WOW!

Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Wednesday, March 16, 2011

Nate Dogg, whose hooks boosted rap hits, dies!

(AP) Singer Nate Dogg, whose near monotone crooning anchored some of rap's most seminal songs and helped define the sound of West coast hip-hop, has died at age 41.


















Attorney Mark Geragos said Nate Dogg, whose real name was Nathaniel D. Hale, died Tuesday of complications from multiple strokes.

Nate Dogg wasn't a rapper, but he was an integral figure in the genre: His deep voice wasn't particularly melodic, but it's tone — at times menacing, at times playful, yet always charming — provided just the just the right touch on hits including Warren G's "Regulate," 50 Cent's "21 Questions," Dr. Dre's "The Next Episode" and countless others.

While Nate Dogg provided hooks for rappers from coast to coast, the Long Beach, Calif., native is best known for his contributions to the West Coast soundtrack provided by the likes of Snoop Dogg, Dr. Dre, the Dogg Pound and more. Nate Dogg was even part of a "supergroup" featuring Snoop Dogg and Warren G, called 213.

Nate Dogg also put out his own solo projects but was best known for his collaborations with others.

He had suffered strokes in recent years.


*RIP Nathaniel D. Hale "aka" Nate Dogg*

Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Hollywood A-listers urge Obama to support gay marriage!

(The Ticket) Just weeks after the Obama administration announced it would no longer legally defend the Defense of Marriage act, some of the president's biggest Hollywood supporters have signed a letter urging him to go a step further and legalize same-sex marriage.

Anne Hathaway, Martin Sheen, Jane Lynch and Ellen DeGeneres are among the actors who have signed an open letter sponsored by Freedom to Marry, a New York-based advocacy group working to promote marriage rights for same-sex couples.

Citing Obama's decision on DOMA last month, the letter calls for Obama to exhibit similar leadership on same-sex marriage rights.

"Whether to end discrimination in marriage is a question America has faced before, and faces again today… It is a question that calls for clarity from the president," the letter reads. "We ask you to complete your journey and join us, and the majority of Americans, who support the freedom to marry."

The letter was also signed by NFL linebackers Scott Fujita of the Cleveland Browns and Brenden
Ayanbadejo of the Baltimore Ravens; entertainment moguls David Geffen and Bob Wright; former NAACP chairman Julian Bond; and Facebook co-founders Chris Hughes and Sean Parker. Hughes, who is openly gay, previously worked for Obama's campaign in 2008, heading up its enormously successful new-media efforts.

The letter comes as Obama prepares to launch his 2012 re-election campaign, in which he will no doubt count on entertainment types as an important source of financial and public support. But the president's relationship with Hollywood has noticeably cooled since 2008, as celebrities have openly expressed their discontent with Obama in part because of his position on same-sex marriage.

Just last month, Matt Damon railed on Obama in an interview with CNN, bluntly saying he has not done a good job as president. Meanwhile, Lynch, the openly gay star of "Glee," called Obama a "huge disappointment" for his handling of gay rights.

Obama has long said that he supports civil unions as an alternative to marriage for gays and lesbians—putting him to the right of former Vice President Dick Cheney, who has endorsed same-sex marriage. But in

December, Obama admitted his views on gay marriage are "evolving" and said he would continue "to wrestle" with the issue.

Last month, the Justice Department dropped its attempts to defend the constitutionality of DOMA in court—with Attorney General Eric Holder saying in a statement that Obama had personally concluded the law was "unconstitutional." Many gay rights supporters view that position as an opening—though it's unclear how far Obama will be willing to go ahead of what could be a tough re-election campaign.


*It's obvious that the President is very busy with what he may deem as more important things. I think (hollywooder's) have to understand that just because they are famous, doesn't mean they get first dibs on the issues they care about. Bottom line; this is an issue and many people are on edge about gay rights and gay marriage as it stands. However; (hollywooder's), should realize that the President's job consist of addressing many issues, and not just one particular issue like "gay marriage.". At the end of the day, President Obama has to pick his battle and this obviously isn't one of them at the moment. All in all, "FALL BACK HOLLYWOODER'S and let the President do his job and you worry about doing yours.*


By: Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Monday, March 14, 2011

U.S. millionaires say $7 million not enough to be rich!

(Reuters) A million dollars ain't what it used to be.

More than four out of ten American millionaires say they do not feel rich. Indeed many would need to have at least $7.5 million in order to feel they were truly rich, according to a Fidelity Investments survey.

Some 42 percent of the more than 1,000 millionaires surveyed by Fidelity said they did not feel wealthy.

Respondents had at least $1 million in investable assets, excluding any real estate or retirement accounts.

"Every person in the survey is wealthy," said Sanjiv Mirchandani, president of National Financial, a unit of Fidelity. "But they are still worried about outliving their assets."

The average age of respondents was 56 years old with a mean of $3.5 million of investable assets. The threshold for "rich" rose with age.

"They compare themselves to their peer group ... and they are also thinking about the long period they will have in retirement and want more assets" to fund their lifestyle, said Michael Durbin, president of Fidelity Institutional Wealth Services.

Still, millionaires are slightly more optimistic now than they were in 2009, when 46 percent did not feel wealthy.

Respondents were also more optimistic about the U.S. economy. While they thought the current U.S. economy remained very weak, they think it will improve by the end of this year.

Fidelity noted the wealthiest 5 percent of Americans hold more than 55 percent of the nation's wealth.


*Well, well now this is really something! This article is dead on as many millionaires don't feel rich. Many are blowing through their money like water. As the economy stays in a weak state, many people are feeling the pinch. Everyday necessities are going up in price, and people are spending more to live. However, if your sitting on cash and don't have to worry about eating, then I say you are rich. You're rich in being blessed where, others are scraping their piggy banks to eat everyday. In this day and age the fact that you have money, should be a blessing instead of complaining that it's not enough.*


Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Sunday, March 13, 2011

The "it" school for our next Einsteins!

(MercuryNews.com) On a typical day at Harker School in San Jose, students are pondering special relativity and mastering multivariable calculus. They're building circuits, splicing genes and, perhaps, dissecting a cat.

Walls are decorated with paintings of epithelial cells. A tall Foucault's pendulum swings from one corner, knocking down a Stephen Hawking doll. Bright blue banners, celebrating victories in science contests, hang from balconies.

But Anita Chetty's classroom is quiet. That's because she's busy planning a research symposium, featuring Sun Microsystems founder and Harker parent Scott McNealy, and she will soon be thinking about the next field trip on invasive species -- in the Galápagos Islands.

Having trouble keeping up? So is much of the rest of the country when it comes to teaching science.

Harker, a young enterprise bankrolled largely by Silicon Valley's newest immigrants, where tuition costs $35,000 a year, is the only school with two finalists at this week's final round of the coveted Intel Awards, the nation's most elite high school science competition.

And to think Harker didn't even have a high school when most of its juniors and seniors were born.

With 20 Intel semifinalists and four finalists in six years, and many other prestigious science titles already to its credit, Harker is fast becoming the "it" school for aspiring researchers, a springboard to a life of inquiry.

How do they do it?

"I don't know what the judges are looking for. I really don't," said Chetty, who chairs Harker's high school science department and helped design the school's research focus. "We are just capitalizing on everything that Silicon Valley has to offer."


Eyes on the prize
Successful students enthusiastically spread the word, then more seek to compete. This year, 80 students applied to the Intel, Siemens, Synopsis and other contests.

For every Texas high school
linebacker who dreams of the NFL, there's a Harker student who will be a first-round intellectual draft choice for Harvard or MIT, on a mission to a Nobel Prize, Fields Medal or MacArthur "genius" grant.

"It's so much fun just to constantly be learning something new every day," said Nikhil Parthasarathy, 17, an Intel finalist for his work researching irregular structures of distant galaxies. He and Rohan Mahajan are representing Harker at the competition in Washington, D.C.

If a student wins a lucrative prize, some of the money gets reinvested in the school, purchasing university-grade research equipment, from a gas chromatograph for analyzing compounds to a spectrophotometer to measure concentrations of chemicals.

"Our students know they're standing on the shoulders of others," said Chetty, a Fiji-born biologist who in 2006 won a Nobel Educator of Distinction award from the Nobel Prize family. "I tell the kids: 'The equipment you're using -- we earned it. Someone else, now at a university, won it for us.'

"It's taken 10 years to finally get here, but we now have all the pieces in place."


Magic formula
Prize-winning research is no longer the kind of undertaking that a student can do at home. Long gone are the days of iconic "October Sky" projects, where boys stood in a field and shot off rockets.

But unlike Harker, most schools don't offer advanced research programs. They may be too far away from university labs or strapped for funds. Their teachers often are too exhausted by the volume of day-to-day work to offer extra help.

Nationally, there is growing concern about the future of American innovation. "We need to teach our kids that it's not just the winner of the Super Bowl who deserves to be celebrated, but the winner of the science fair," President Barack Obama said at his State of the Union address.

Harker has identified a magic formula: dedicated parents, smart students, a rigorous curriculum, creative faculty and the strong support of local universities. And considerable sums of money.

The student body is 70 percent Asian, half of that number being Indian. Harker parents are well-educated professionals, with expectations of high acheivement.

There are four advanced degrees in the families of this year's two finalists: two Ph.D.s and two master's. Both sets of parents are first-generation Indian immigrants.

"Our parents have an innate respect for teachers," Chetty said. "I might be sitting in front of a parent with four or five patents to their name, but they hold me in such high esteem.

"They understand that hard work is the key ingredient to success, and they instill that in their children," she said. "And they know sometimes you fail first. Those are the two ingredients for good scientists."


Sunday lab work
Mahajan, 17, learned about disappointment firsthand -- two weeks into his summer internship at UC Santa Cruz, where he sought ways to improve the efficiency of photoelectrochemical cells. After an initial success, his technique failed. So he had to start over and redesign his project, which involved hot furnaces and toxic gases.

"I was under real time pressure," he said. "I think it inspired me. The new one was a lot more complicated and even better than the original project. I started working a lot harder. So it ended up being a good thing."
His fellow finalist Parthasarathy got interested in astrophysics after a summer program at NASA Ames

Research Center in Mountain View. Although his original research at UC Santa Cruz was done by late summer, the writing of his Intel essays and research paper had to be squeezed into a schedule already packed with tests, tennis practice and Saturdays at the San Francisco Conservatory of Music, where music theory class starts at 8 a.m.

"Sundays, maybe I watch TV," he said, then laughed. "Not really."

Such research is possible because of Harker's unusual academic curriculum. Students who do well in summer school can study AP physics, chemistry or biology as mere sophomores and juniors. This frees up time for electives like organic chemistry, biotechnology, astronomy and electronics.

It even offers two classes specifically devoted to research: "Research Methods" and "Advanced Research," where they learn how to accept constructive criticism.

"Harker is really willing to make a class for anyone, especially in math," Parthasarathy said. "There are so many kids who are, like, genius kids. There is one kid in ninth grade and he's in my Differential Equations class."


Not just hard work
Students are so well prepared, said physics teacher Chris Spenner, "that I can go beyond the AP curriculum, adding subjects like special relativity. They're so advanced in math, I can do multivariable calculus. "... I've taught at other schools and never seen anything like this."

On field trips to the Galapagos, they study with native children; in Costa Rica, they build turtle pens, snorkel in nature preserves and study biodiversity.

"We try to show them that research is not just hard work -- pound, pound, pound," said biology teacher Matthew Harley, who holds a Ph.D. in biochemistry from Johns Hopkins.

"It's creative thinking, to be able to incorporate all these different concepts from different fields," he said. "Science is our future. Someday they'll have answers to questions we haven't even thought of yet."

The preparation begins early. Even in elementary school, special science classes are held four times a week, by teachers holding bachelor's degrees in the sciences.

By fifth grade, students are using digital microscopes. Experiments, such as altering bacteria, start in sixth grade. By seventh grade, they're offered honors classes in physics, chemistry or biology. Math is taught, not by age, but ability; advanced students simply move up to high school.

There's a middle school "Research Club," led by an engineer with help from a Ph.D. chemist. One youngster, worried about radiation in her family's new kitchen countertops, tested granite slabs with a Geiger counter.

"The questions come from their own minds," said K-8 science department chair Lorna Claerbot.


Contest fever
High school welcomes them with a gleaming new Science & Technology Center: 16 classrooms, a lecture hall, robotics lab, cyber study loft and the pendulum, which demonstrates the rotation of Earth.
Costing $25 million, the building was built with the help of $1 million gifts from parents.

Contest fever starts junior year. Early on, teachers help identify interests, narrow the focus and locate supportive labs where advanced research is already under way. Some students compete for Harker-sponsored internships, which Chetty has arranged. Others must find their own. The only real coaching, teachers say, is about how to write e-mails to busy scientists.

For students working at school, nights can get late.

"I'd pick up Subway sandwiches for both of us, and bring them back," said Harley, recalling lab work until 10 p.m. with one student, now at UC Berkeley. "We kept getting kicked out by security."

Then, quickly, technical papers are written and rewritten. Charts and tables are formatted. Deadlines are met. Awaiting them at the Intel competition this week is a possible $100,000 prize, accolades and college acceptances. But all that would be just an extra thrill, they said. Already they've taken a life-altering step that will carry them into their adult lives.

"What's fun is the fact that no one's ever answered these problems before. No one knows the answer," Parthasarathy said.

"If you can add value, it is an incredible feeling."


*Can you say "AMEN" and do a "ONE TWO STEP" for a school that's making the headlines for doing great things! This school is a prime example of how students are mastering and being very creative. It' something you don't hear about everyday.  Harker School is doing big things and definitely helping students acheive in every way they can. They are providing the students with the tools to take their education to whole new level. That is priceless! With all of that being said, we do understand that it cost money to attend, and that this school gets grant money and all the bells and whistles.  What they are doing, they need to keep it up as other schools around the nation can take heed to what this school's formula is, and possibly apply it to see if it can work for them. At the end of the day, we as parents, teachers, politicians, community members and others have to get on the grind and try to inspire, motivate and bring up our failing schools. It's not an option, it's a must, especially when schools like "Harker" is thriving.*


Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Obama keeps focus on fight for women's equality!

(AP) Father of two girls, President Barack Obama says he wants to improve the status of women in the United States.

Women are more likely than men to graduate from college today, yet earn less on average, face a greater chance of living in poverty and are outnumbered in critical subjects such as math and science, he said in his weekly radio and online address Saturday.

"Achieving equality and opportunity for women isn't just important to me as president. It's something I care about deeply as the father of two daughters who wants to see his girls grow up in a world where there are no limits to what they can achieve," he said.

Obama noted that one of his first acts as president was to sign legislation allowing women who've been discriminated against in their salaries to have their day in court. Obama said he was disappointed when the Senate blocked action on a proposal that would treat gender discrimination involving pay in the same as race, disability and age discrimination.

The Senate in November fell just short of the votes needed to overcome GOP opposition and move ahead on the bill, which would make employers prove that any disparities in wages are job-related and not sex-based.

"At a time when folks across this country are struggling to make ends meet — and many families are just trying to get by on one paycheck after a job loss — it's a reminder that achieving equal pay for equal work isn't just a women's issue," the president said in his weekly radio and online address. "It's a family issue."

He said he would not relent in fighting for the goals of that legislation. He also said women on average make about 75 cents for each dollar a man earns and are more likely to fall in poverty.

Republicans and business groups said the Paycheck Fairness Act would expose employers to more litigation by removing limits on punitive and compensatory damage awards.


*Very interesting and truly about time that someone does something about how women seem to be treated when it comes to being paid. There's more opportunity for women to make bank, but less of those top of the line "boss" roles. For years women have fought for equality in the work place and elsewhere in society.  It's very sad that women are still fighting for that in these times. Hopefully with President Obama at the wheel, things can get done so that women have a fighting chance to prove their cases and make more bank, even if it's more than their male counterparts.  I guess if it takes more time, then women can always continue to start their own companies and forge ahead that way instead of still fighting these egotistical men for well deserved pay.*


Diva's Nation
*Join The Conversation*